Cancerbackup: Q-832

Skip the page content navigation if you do not require links to content sections within this page.

Page Content Navigation

Skip the main banner if you do not want to read it as the next section.


Page Banner

Want to speak to a specialist cancer nurse? Call free on 0808 800 1234



The best cancer information for everyone.
Cancerbackup has merged with Macmillan. Together we can provide a wealth of high quality information about cancer.


Skip the main content if you do not want to read it as the next section.


I had treatment two years ago for cervical cancer, hysterectomy and chemotherapy. The cancer has now comeback. The doctors have suggested chemotherapy but I am not sure about this. What would happen if I don't have treatment?

Many people are frightened about the prospect of chemotherapy, particularly because of all the publicity that has been given to possible side effects. Modern chemotherapy and modern ways to avoid or reduce side effects have made chemotherapy today much easier to tolerate than ever before and most people find it is not nearly as bad as they expect. Nevertheless it is a treatment that people would prefer to avoid if they could and when their doctor suggests chemotherapy some people ask what would happen if they don't have it.

When a cancer of the cervix has spread to other organs in the body then treatment with chemotherapy is designed to try and shrink the growth, to improve symptoms, to keep up a good quality of life and to prolong life, if possible. Unfortunately a cure really isn't possible. Making decisions about treatment in these circumstances is always difficult.

If you do have the chemotherapy it is possible that this will lead to control, and possibly shrinkage of the cancer with relief of any symptoms, improvement in quality of life, and maybe even some prolongation of life. Some women will have quite significant benefit while others will have no improvement at all and will therefore have the side-effects of the treatment without any benefit. The fitter a woman is from a general point of view the more likely they are to have benefit and less likely to have side-effects.

The alternative to having chemotherapy would be to simply have 'supportive treatment' which is aimed not at controlling the cancer itself but at easing any symptoms as and when they develop and helping to get the best possible quality of life. This would usually rely on 'non-chemotherapy' medication like steroids and pain killers to keep life as normal as possible with the minimum of side-effects and disruption to daily routine. There would still be an active contact with a medical and nursing team to oversee your care during this time. So not having chemotherapy does not mean that you would be left to cope on your own.

The choice of treatment is a decision which is in your own hands but it may help to discuss this in detail with your doctor who can help you decide about the pros and cons of having chemotherapy and the benefits you might hope to expect in your own individual circumstances. Rest assured that the decision you make will be respected by your medical team who will still continue to ensure you are given the best possible care, whatever you decide.


Content last reviewed: 29 April 2004
Page last modified: 27 May 2003

Get support

Look for other people in the same situation on our What Now? community - read their blogs or talk to them in our chat rooms.

Find out about other ways to get support on the main Macmillan website.